Designer of collapse bridge in Isabela.

The bridge collapsed on the evening of February 27, 2025 injuring six people. The bridge was built in 2014, with construction lasting more than 10 years. It just opened in 2025.

The Cabagan-Sta. Maria Bridge collapsed on February 27 when a dump truck carrying quarried stones weighing 102 tons, almost double the 45-ton maximum capacity, attempted to cross it. At least six people were injured in the incident.

Engr. Alberto C. Cañete, the original designer of the collapsed bridge in Isabela, was my professor in college for Matrix Analysis of Structures, Reinforced Concrete Design 1, Reinforced Concrete Design 2, and Steel Design. During my years at PUP-Sta. Mesa, no other professors in the Civil Engineering department were assigned to teach these courses—only Engr. Cañete. Why? Because he was the most qualified and had the authority to teach them.

As a past president of the Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP), he contributes his knowledge and expertise in the regular updating of the National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP), the very book that every Civil Engineering student in this country is well acquainted with—our "bible." Every time we attended his classes, he didn’t need to open the book because he practically knew everything written in it, even the exact page numbers.

In those four courses he taught, I failed three the first time. During my college years, from 2004 to 2009, PUP’s Civil Engineering department never had a Latin honor graduate because a grade of 3.0 was already considered a consolation—Engr. Cañete always set a very high standard. He wasn’t a terror, actually. But what made it even scarier was that having him as a professor was unavoidable.

It is not the original structural designer nor the structural designer responsible for the retrofitting who should be questioned. Instead, the irresponsible company that allowed overloading to cut hauling costs, the rampant corruption in the DPWH and in this country— which is public knowledge— and the construction management team that failed to meet the design specifications so they could pocket millions deserve more scrutiny.

Edit:

I made this post because it seems we are already pointing fingers at the structural designer, even though no forensic structural investigation has started yet. We may be blaming the wrong people after all. And as his former student, even though I received failing grades in his courses back in college, I bear no ill will toward Engr. Cañete. He is a well-respected professor and peer in the field of civil engineering, particularly in structural engineering. All structural engineers are civil engineers but not all civil engineers are structural engineers. For us civil engineers, structural engineers of his caliber are like associate justices—if not the chief justice—of our judiciary system. He just doesn’t deserve the pre-investigation negative treatment he is already receiving from those in power, nor the misjudgment from the public. We must protect the good, or we will allow evil to prevail.

𝘍𝘐𝘓𝘐𝘗𝘐𝘕𝘖 𝘝𝘌𝘙𝘚𝘐𝘖𝘕:

𝘚𝘪 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘳. 𝘈𝘭𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘊. 𝘊𝘢ñ𝘦𝘵𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘺𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘶𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘢 𝘐𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘢, 𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘬𝘰 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘺𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘹 𝘈𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘙𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 1, 𝘙𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 2, 𝘢𝘵 𝘚𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘋𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯. 𝘕𝘰𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘩𝘰𝘯 𝘬𝘰 𝘴𝘢 𝘗𝘜𝘗-𝘚𝘵𝘢. 𝘔𝘦𝘴𝘢, 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘢 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘊𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘰—𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘳. 𝘊𝘢ñ𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨. 𝘉𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘵? 𝘋𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘭 𝘴𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘬𝘢-𝘬𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘬𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘸𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥 𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘪𝘵𝘰.

𝘉𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 (𝘈𝘚𝘌𝘗), 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘰𝘺 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘨𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘢𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘬𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘨-𝘶𝘱𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘨 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 (𝘕𝘚𝘊𝘗), 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘨 𝘊𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢 𝘗𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘴. 𝘐𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 "𝘣𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘺𝘢." 𝘚𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘬 𝘬𝘢𝘮𝘪 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘦, 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘶𝘬𝘴𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘬𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘪𝘵𝘰, 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘬𝘴𝘢𝘬𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘨-𝘶𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘦. 

𝘚𝘢 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢, 𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘭𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘬𝘰 𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘬𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘰𝘯. 𝘚𝘢 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘺𝘰 𝘢𝘬𝘰, 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘰𝘯𝘨 2004 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘨 2009, 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘓𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘢 𝘊𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘯𝘨 𝘗𝘜𝘗 𝘥𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘨 3.0 𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘴𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘺𝘰𝘯—𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘬𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘪 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘳. 𝘊𝘢ñ𝘦𝘵𝘦. 𝘏𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳, 𝘴𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨. 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳. 𝘋𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘬𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘬𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘢-𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘦.

𝘏𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘸𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘺𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘯. 𝘚𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘱, 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘢-𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘬 𝘶𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘴𝘢 𝘨𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘬𝘰𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘱 𝘯𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘴𝘺𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘢 𝘋𝘗𝘞𝘏 𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘢 𝘣𝘶𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘢—𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘵—𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘢 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘴𝘶𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘥 𝘴𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘺𝘰 𝘶𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘭𝘴𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘢 𝘣𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘵.

𝘎𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘸𝘢 𝘬𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘢 𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘭 𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘢 𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘪 𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳, 𝘬𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘉𝘢𝘬𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘪. 𝘈𝘵 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘪 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘳. 𝘊𝘢ñ𝘦𝘵𝘦, 𝘬𝘢𝘩𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘨𝘢𝘱 𝘢𝘬𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘴𝘢𝘬 𝘯𝘢 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘢 𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘺𝘰, 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘢 𝘢𝘬𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘢 𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘣 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘢. 𝘐𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘺𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘶𝘣𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘢𝘱𝘸𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘺𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘴𝘢 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘭𝘢𝘭𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨.

𝘓𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘺 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘭𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴. 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘬𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘥 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘢𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘩𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘥 𝘴𝘢 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴—𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘧 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦—𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢. 𝘚𝘢 𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘱𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘴𝘺𝘰𝘯, 𝘭𝘢𝘭𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘺𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘩𝘢𝘯, 𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘪𝘺𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘩𝘶𝘴𝘨𝘢 𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘰. 𝘋𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘨𝘰𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪, 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪, 𝘩𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘯.

(Photo CTTO)